IP Inclusive is not a political organisation and avoids engaging in political lobbying. However, we do try to encourage positive change in our sector. Where we become aware of inequalities, or policies that impact negatively on EDI in the IP professions, we seek to catalyse improvements. This extends to issues that could unfairly restrict access to, or progression within, IP-related careers.
Here you can download copies of the responses we have filed to consultations, and of other public submissions we have made on issues relating to equity, diversity, inclusion, accessibility and wellbeing.
We continue to welcome requests and suggestions from IP professionals who are affected by relevant issues, and where feasible we will help them address those issues. Our six communities also provide forums through which to channel concerns about challenges affecting specific groups.
CIPA
Response to:
European Patent Office
IP Inclusive response to:
IP Ability submissions on:
- Enlarged Board of Appeal referral G 1/21 regarding oral proceedings by video conference (April 2021)
- Discussion paper on proposed new e-EQE (June 2021)
Intellectual Property Regulation Board (IPReg)
Responses and submissions relating to:
- IPReg’s 2017 CPD review
- October 2020 call for evidence in IPReg’s review of its regulatory arrangements
- December 2021 consultation on proposed changes to the regulatory arrangements
Plus responses to IPReg’s annual consultations on its business plans, budgets and practising fees:
Legal Services Board
Responses to:
- November 2025 consultation on a proposed statement of policy for encouraging a diverse legal profession (plus Annex I: our 2025 Impact Report)
Patent Examination Board
Submissions regarding: